[ 王友明 ]——(2003-9-7) / 已閱27264次
[14] 甘明秀主編：《刑事訴訟實(shí)用大全》，河北人民出版社，1993年8月版，第295-296頁(yè)。
[15] 最高人民檢察院法律政策研究編著：《檢察法律文書(shū)制作與適用》，中國(guó)法制出版社，2002年2月版，第510頁(yè)。
[16] 常艷：《試析公訴案件的撤回起訴》，《人民檢察》1999年第4期。
[17] 趙軍、王良華：《準(zhǔn)許公訴機(jī)關(guān)撤回起訴的刑事裁定——被告人不應(yīng)享有上訴權(quán)》，《人民法院報(bào)》2002年7月29日，第3版。
[18] 常艷：《試析公訴案件的撤回起訴》，《人民檢察》1999年第4期
[19] 熊選國(guó)主編：《刑事訴訟法司法解釋釋疑》，中國(guó)法制出版社，2002年4月版，第141-142頁(yè)。
On Withdrawal of Charges
Wang Youming Yang Xinjing
( 1 The People's Procuratorate of Fuyang of Anhui, 236000; 2 The National Prosecutors Collage, Beijing 100041 )
Abstract: Withdrawal of charges which has abolished by revised The Criminal Procedure Law of China is an action of court hearing. It is say that the procuratorial organ hasn't the right of withdrawal of charges. But The Supreme People's Court and The Supreme People's Procuratorate given the right of withdrawal of charges to procuratorial organ newly through judicial interpretation of law. And the judicial interpretation of law has led judicial practice to trouble.
Key words: Withdrawal of charges; judicial interpretation of law; Conflict of laws; Judicial suggestion.
總共2頁(yè) [1] 2
上一頁(yè)
